(Source: rightsideover, via peasandlove07)
(Source: purely-stained, via itmakesmewonder)
(via h4nzka)
(via chickennuqqetz)
(Source: powrie, via beinganywhere)
(Source: bleubirdvintage.typepad.com, via chickennuqqetz)
(Source: paper-fly, via coffeebound)
In 1998, The Body Shop debuted its self-esteem campaign, featuring the generously proportioned doll we dubbed “Ruby.” … …
Ruby was a fun idea, but she carried a serious message. She was intended to challenge stereotypes of beauty and counter the pervasive influence of the cosmetics industry, of which we understood we were a part. Perhaps more than we had even hoped, Ruby kick-started a worldwide debate about body image and self-esteem.
But Ruby was not universally loved. In the United States, the toy company Mattel sent us a cease-and-desist order, demanding we pull the images of Ruby from American shop windows. Their reason: Ruby was making Barbie look bad, presumably by mocking the plastic twig-like bestseller (Barbie dolls sell at a rate of two per second; it’s hard to see how our Ruby could have done any meaningful damage.) I was ecstatic that Mattel thought Ruby was insulting to Barbie — the idea of one inanimate piece of molded plastic hurting another’s feelings was absolutely mind-blowing.
♥
(Source: beautiful-sadness, via appypollylogies)
Deusa ♥
(Source: rainbowhores, via yoursicklittlegames)
